perukmfk.blogg.se

World of warships missouri vs montana
World of warships missouri vs montana





world of warships missouri vs montana

Average number of ships destroyed? Well, seems closer than it is. The percentage damage is whatever in my oppinion, if there are more solid, direct numbers available. Where are efforts to drag the other tier 10 BBs down to Kurfürst levels and later all four a little lower? Conqueror is closer to the others than it seems, Kurfürst is lacking, BBs are known to be problematic. Compared to WOT there is something that diversifies the value of damage, repairable and non-repairable. What do all BBs, Atago (+re-skin), T9/10 CA/CL, few DDs have? A repair that repairs all fire damage, but only parts of penetration damage and far less percentage of citadel damage depending on which ship and tier 10 ships have their fair chances to meet lots of ships that are listed here. On the first look it seems one-sided, but which ship is most notable for HE-Spam or even HE-Only? Conqueror. Yamato seems pretty close to Montana and Conqueror seems to have a comfortable lead. In regards to damage Kurfürst obviously does worse which shouldn't be a surprise with it not having a super sigma or super accuracy compared with not so great pen in a game where main artillery is potencially the biggest factor. People with little experience or people with "no desirable cognitive potencial" or the ones who allways play what is most broken in order to act like stats created this way mean something will wonder or pretent to wonder what is going on.

world of warships missouri vs montana

I got to write this a little moderator conform.







World of warships missouri vs montana